CSC408 MIS Case Study Assignment Report: Analysis of Issues and Solutions in Information Systems
University | Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) |
Subject | CSC408 Management Information Systems |
Case Study Scoring Rubric
Rubric code | Rubric Criteria & Weightage | Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | Introduction [3] | Excellent explanation and overview of the case study topic | Good explanation and overview of the case study topic | Adequate explanation and overview of the case study topic | Inadequate explanation and overview of the case study topic |
R2 | Analysis [5] | Comprehensive and thorough analysis that covers all aspects of the topic | Clear analysis that covers all aspects of the topic | Basic analysis that covers all aspects of the topic | Incomplete and wrong understanding in analysis of all aspects of the topic. |
R3 | Identify issues [3] • Students will identify real or potential problems |
Thoroughly and accurately identifies and summarizes main issues, critically addressing their relationships with each other | Clearly identifies and summarizes the main issues but hardly addresses their relationship to each other. | Adequately identifies main issues but does not summarize or explain them clearly or sufficiently | Poorly identifies, summarizes, or explains the main issue or question. Represents the issues inaccurately or inappropriately. |
R4 | Identify solutions [4] • Students will develop, evaluate, and present possible solutions where appropriate |
Thoroughly defines steps in problem-solving. • Achieves, clear conclusions from the data • Employs creativity in the search for a solution. • Recognizes and values alternative problem-solving methods, when appropriate. |
Clearly defines steps in problem-solving. • Focuses on difficult problems with persistence. • Understand the real-world relevance of the problem. • Provides a logical interpretation of the data |
Adequately defines steps in problem-solving. • Can identify problem types. • Relies on standardized solution methods, rather than guesswork or intuition. • Understands the level of complexity of a problem. |
Inadequate description of problem-solving steps. • Does not understand problems in the given context. • Inability to choose appropriate solutions |
R5 | Knowledge extraction [5] (Suggestion, comparison, information accuracy, conclusion) |
Proficient (outstanding) explanation | Clear explanation | Adequate explanation | Poor explanation |
R6 | Report writing element [3] • Structured and organized • Clarity of language • Consistency of content Use of figurative language for all materials |
Comprehensively reflects the following elements: • The text is distinctly understandable. • The format is both appropriate and attractive. • No misspelled words (or make only a rare misspelling in a long or complex text). |
Clearly reflects the following elements: • The text is clearly understandable. • The format is appropriate. • Few misspellings in proportion to the length and complexity of the text |
Adequately reflects the following elements: • The text is generally understandable. • The format is acceptable. • Several misspellings in proportion to the length and complexity of the text. |
Poorly reflects the following elements: • The text is generally poorly written. • The format is unacceptable. • Frequent misspellings are distracting, regardless of the length or complexity of the text. |
R7 | Anti-plagiarism | Refer to the note for the next course of action. |
MQF2 Rubric Criteria | Weight | Score (1-4) | Marks |
---|---|---|---|
LOTS Introduction | 3 | ||
COGNITIVE Analysis | 5 | ||
COGNITIVE Identify issues | 4 | ||
HOTS Identify solutions | 5 | ||
PRACTICAL SKILLS Knowledge extraction | 5 | ||
PRACTICAL SKILLS Report writing | 3 | ||
Total marks (/100) | (20%) |
*Note: Case Study/Assignment Submission Guidelines for ETHICS requirements.
You are required to use an anti-plagiarism tool advised by your lecturer to check your assignment for plagiarism and whether it complies with ethical standards regarding originality and citation. The tool will also check the similarity of your work to original sources. Your lecturer will confirm whether they require a hard copy of your assignment and/or a soft copy (For example: via Turnitin/online portal). Below is the Anti-Plagiarism Criterion Rubric guide, which will be used to assess your anti-plagiarism compliance.
SIMILARITY INDEX/AI DETECTION (%) | Result | Action |
---|---|---|
<25% | Proceed to submit | No further revisions are needed; unless otherwise instructed by the lecturer. |
>=25% | Re-submit | Revise the assignment to reduce similarity and ensure proper citation, then submit again. |
Get Help By Expert
If you are worried about the MIS Case Study Assignment: Analysis of Issues and Solutions in Information Systems, then no need to worry anymore! With a management assignment helper, you will get expert guidance and help on assignments that will strengthen your concepts. We also provide you with free assignment samples that will help you understand. And the best part? All the content is 100% original, written by PhD expert writers, and well-researched, so that you get the best quality. So don’t delay now; boost your grades with our help!
Recent Solved Questions
- Organization Behavior Case Study, SU, Malaysia In CIMB, Datuk Seri Nazir Razak’s participative leadership style can be seen in his establishment of various management
- BNBS 6114: Communication and Counselling Essay, LUC, Malaysia Communication is vital in improving health outcomes. Due to the new challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic
- Energy Fuel and Power Technology Division Assignment, UON, Malaysia You have been assigned to conduct an evaluation of the bioenergy opportunity by selecting ONE source of biomass
- Computer Science Data Structure Assignment, UKM, Malaysia In a small town far away, a young man dreamed of one day making it big in finance. He didn’t have much to his name
- MPU3233 Assignment 3: Design Thinking Implementation: Prototyping, Testing
- BNRE 6113: Learning Skill Assignment, LUC, Malaysia Discuss key components of academic writing and give reasons why statements
- TCP3151: Integrative Programming and Technologies Assignment, MMU, Malaysia Java’s main function invokes the first and second native methods and displays the ‘content of the sorted array
- SQG2613: Research Methodology Research Paper, UTM, Malaysia Investigate current study trends based on the selected study areas related to Civil Engineering
- SHAS 3368: Islamic Law of Succession Assignment, IIUM, Malaysia
- Innovation management and new product development Assignment, APU, Malaysia Discuss the growth strategies in Ansoff s Matrix that can be opted to Influence the growth of the newly developed product