HMEF5023_V2 Educational Leadership Assignment Question 2026 | OUM Malaysia
| University | Open University Malaysia (OUM) |
| Subject | HMEF5023 Educational Leadership |
HMEF5023 Assignment Question
Purpose
The objective of the assignment is to synthesize and critically evaluate the relationship between contemporary educational leadership practices and findings
from selected case studies and empirical research.
Part 1: Journal Article Review (20%)
Review and synthesise insights from the following journal article:
Sultan, F. M. M., Karuppannan, G., & Rumpod, J. (2022). Instructional Leadership Practices Among Headmasters and The Correlation with Primary Schools’
Achievement in Sabah, Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n2p50
Your synthesis should include:
- Summary of Focus: Outline the main objectives and scope of the study.
- Significance of the Study: Highlight the relevance and implications of the research for educational leadership.
- Key Methodologies: Describe the methods employed in the research and their appropriateness for achieving the study’s goals.
- Findings and Contributions: Summarize the key results and contributions to the field of educational leadership.
- Critical Review: Provide your personal critique of the article, discussing strengths, limitations, and areas for future research.
Use your own words throughout the synthesis, maintaining a clear and structured approach.
[Total: 20 marks]
Part 2: In-Depth Interview Report (30%)
Use the above article in Part 1 (Sultan et al., 2022) as a reference to conduct an in-depth interview (online or face-to-face) with 2 (TWO) senior teachers who have been teaching for more than five years at any school/institution to address the following research objective/research question:
Research Objective:
To examine the teachers’ perceptions of the school principal’s leadership qualities.
Research Question:
What are the teachers’ perceptions of the leadership qualities exhibited by the school principal?
In your report, you need to include the following elements.
i. The profile of the key informants: Write in detail the profile of these two key informants, to be written descriptively (NOT in table form).
ii. Qualitative data analysis: Analyse descriptively and narratively the in-depth interviews in the qualitative Your analysis should use these themes: accountability, communication, decision-making, and time management. Please note that it is NOT in a dialogue/conversation form or raw data.
iii. Key findings and conclusion: Elaborate on key findings and draw a conclusion
[Total: 30 Marks]
Part 3: Online Class Participation (10%)
This part requires students to participate actively in the MyINSPIRE eforum. Discuss the following topics in the forum and submit proof of your participation with your tutor and peers in the eforum online discussions:
- Discuss the difference between the functions of management and leadership.
- Discuss Locke and Latham’s Goal-Setting Theory and how the theory can be used to motivate teachers in schools.
- How does a principal’s leadership style (e.g., transformational vs. instructional) directly influence the formation of a positive, learning-centered school culture?
- What are the key strategies a school leader must employ to overcome resistance and ensure successful change management among staff?
- What are the ethical implications of ensuring accountability focuses on professional development rather than just punitive measures?
[Total: 10 marks]
[TOTAL: 60 MARKS]
Instruction on how to submit proof of online class participation:
- Select the best FIVE (5) postings from your forum discussion set in the assignment.
- Take screenshots of the postings and include them as images in your Part 1 and Part 2 assignment file.
- The screenshots should be in an image file (either in JPG or PNG format). Refer to the sample of Screen Grab below 4. The screenshots should contain the name, title of the discussion, day, date and time.
HMEF5023 Assignment Rubrics
Part 1: Journal Article Review (20%)
| QN | CLO | Criteria | Weightage | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory
Or No response |
Max Marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 2 | Summary of Focus | 1.0 | Provides a comprehensive summary of the article’s objectives, scope, and research focus with exceptional clarity and coherence. | Clearly outlines the objectives and scope of the article with minor omissions or lack of depth. | Provides a general summary but lacks details or depth in explaining the objectives and scope. | Vaguely describes the focus with missing key details or lack of clarity. | No summary is provided. | 4 | |
| 2 | Significance of the Study | 1.0 | Clearly explains the relevance and implications of the study for educational leadership, demonstrating deep understanding. | Describes the importance of the study with reasonable clarity but lacks depth or some key implications. | Provides a basic explanation of the study’s significance, but some points are underdeveloped. | Gives a vague or superficial description of the study’s importance with little critical insight. | No discussion on the significance of the study. | 4 | |
| 1 | Key Methodologies | 1.0 | Provides a detailed explanation of the research design, sampling method, data collection techniques, and analysis approach with strong justification. | Discusses the methodology effectively but lacks minor details or justification. | Mentions key aspects of the methodology but lacks explanation of their appropriateness. | Provides minimal discussion of methodology with missing components or unclear explanations.. | No discussion of methodology is provided | 4 | |
| 2 | Findings and Contributions | 1.0 | Presents a well-structured synthesis of the article’s key findings and contributions to educational leadership, with critical insights. | Summarizes the findings and contributions adequately but lacks deeper analysis. | Mentions findings and contributions but lacks depth and connection to leadership. | Provides a vague or unclear discussion of findings with little relevance to the field. | No discussion of findings and contributions. | 4 | |
| 2 | Critical Review (Personal Response and
Critique) |
1.0 | Provides a highly insightful critique of the article, identifying strengths, limitations, and areas for future research with clear reasoning and examples. | Offers a well-structured critique with strengths and limitations, but some points may need more depth. | Discusses strengths and weaknesses but lacks clear examples or justification. | Provides a weak critique with little personal reflection or critical analysis. | No personal critique is evident. | 4 | |
| Total | 5.0 | 20 | |||||||
Part 2: In-Depth Interview Report (30%)
| QN | CLO | Criteria | Weightage | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory
Or No response |
Max Marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 2 | 3 | Profile of two key informants | 1.0 | The profile of the key informants is written excellently and detailed. | The profile of the key informants is written well and quite detailed. | The profile of the key informants is written adequately and in less detail. | The profile of the key informants is written poorly and lacks details. | There is no profile of key informants. | 4 |
| 3 | Qualitative Data Analysis
i. accountability ii. communication iii. decision making iv. time management |
4.0 | The thematic analysis is excellent with strong evidence to support it. Good effort to elaborate with the combination of reported speech and direct speech. | The thematic analysis is good with evidence to support it. Good effort to elaborate with the combination of reported speech and direct speech. | The thematic analysis is average with some supporting evidence. Some effort was made to elaborate on the combination of reported speech and direct speech. | The thematic analysis is weak with no evidence to support it. A limited effort to elaborate with the combination of reported speech and direct speech. | There is no thematic analysis evident. | 16 | |
| 3 | Key Findings and Conclusion | 2.5 | The findings and conclusion are presented with an excellent writeup. | The findings and conclusion are presented with a write-up. | The findings and conclusion are presented with an adequate write-up. | The findings and conclusion are merely presented in a limited writeup. | There is no finding and conclusion write-up. | 10 | |
| Total | 7.5 | 30 | |||||||
Part 3: Online Class Participation (10%)
| QN | CLO | Criteria | Weightage | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Unsatisfactory | Max marks |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 3 | 3 | Quality of Postings | 2.5 | All five comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and respectful. Postings reflect active participation within the assignment timeline. | Four of the comments are good, appropriate, relevant, meaningful, and respectful.
Postings reflect participation within the assignment timeline. |
Two or three comments are somewhat good, appropriate, meaningful and respectful.
Postings show relatively short participation time. |
One post was submitted.
OR All posts are done in one day. OR None of the comments is good and relevant. OR Comments are short responses that are either substantial or meaningful. Minimum effort (e.g. “I agree with Tina”) |
Postings are done past the assignment timeline.
OR No postings given as proof of participation in discussion. |
10 |
| Total Marks | 2.5 | 10 |
Get Help By Expert
Planning to start your HMEF5023 Educational Leadership assignment but feeling unsure about how to handle journal reviews and interview analysis? Many students find it difficult to critically evaluate research articles, conduct qualitative analysis, and structure their findings properly. If you’re facing the same challenges or running short on time, you can go with Assignment Helper, where our experts provide detailed education assignment help based on your course requirements. You can also explore our OUM assignment examples to see how well-structured answers are written. Use our homework helper and get a customised solution for your HMEF5023 assignment.
Recent Solved Questions
- AAC20403: Financial Accounting and Reporting Assignment, MSU, Malaysia Using a diagram clearly explains the concept of price ceiling and Why are traders not able to adhere to the ceiling price of chicken
- FFN20303: A bond matures in 12 years and pay 8 percent coupon annually. The bond has face value of RM1000: Money And Capital Market Assignment, MSU, Malaysia
- JFP463E: Finance Assignment, USM, Malaysia Conduct interviews with 5 investors/respondents to explore and understand their investment behavior
- EPS0317- You are instructed to prepare a sale and purchase agreement for a terrace house in Cheras: Bar Council Malaysia Ethics and Professional Standards Course, Assignment, UKM, Malaysia
- DPA40113: COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING 2 Assignment, PM, Malaysia Display whether the company should buy or continue to manufacture the components
- EED308/05: “Teachers need to equip students with 21st century skills like critical thinking, creativity, collaboration: English Language Teaching in Malaysia Assignment, WOU, Malaysia
- Managing Accounting Assignment, UiTM, Malaysia Carefeel, a manufacturing company uses a job-costing system. The company plant has a machining department
- ACC30305: Principles of Accounting Assignment, TU, Malaysia Mr Peter, a sole trader, started his frozen food business on 1st January 2021 under the name of Peter Frozen Enterprise
- AC4012: Introduction to Financial Accounting Report, SC, Malaysia You are required to choose TWO listed companies from Bursa Malaysia with the annual report from 2014 onwards
- Nueral Crest Cells Assignment, OUM, Malaysia Jelaskan konsep etika dan peradaban yang diamalkan dalam konteks Malaysia sebagai pelajar bagaimanakah anda mengaplikasikanya
