Scientific Research Review Assignment 4: Advancements and Ethical Practices in Your Study Area Literature Synthesis
University | Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) |
Subject | Research Methodology |
Assignment 4: Review Paper
Weightage: 15%
Course Outcome (CO): Identify appropriate research methods for a research project and
scientific writing ethics (A4, EM)
Program Outcome (PO4): Merancang dan melaksanakan tugas penyelidikan secara
profesional, beretika dan bertanggungjawab
Assignment Instructions
You are required to write an individual review paper on a topic on advancements in your
area of study. This paper must demonstrate your ability to plan, execute, and present a
scholarly task ethically and professionally. You are encouraged to reuse, expand, or
refine materials (e.g., literature, annotated sources, tables, or review structure)
developed in your previous assignments.
Your review must:
- Synthesise a minimum of 10 academic sources (Scopus/WoS indexed journals).
- Include critical reflection and not just summary.
- Show ethical writing practices in tone, structure, and referencing.
Format:
- Word count: 1,500–2,000 words
- APA referencing style
- Submission: PDF format via PutraBlast
- Deadline: 3 weeks from the assignment date
Suggested Structure of Review Paper
- Title
- Abstract (150–200 words)
- Introduction
- Background and significance of the topic
- Purpose and scope of the review
- Thematic Review (2–4 structured themes)
- Theme 1: Analysis with supporting sources
- Theme 2: Analysis with comparisons
- Theme 3 (optional): Emerging issues or innovations
- Discussion
- Implications for research practice or ethics
- Identify trends, gaps, or limitations in the reviewed works
- Conclusion
- Key insights and recommendations
- References (APA style)
Rubric for Review Paper (15 Marks) – PO4 (A)
Criteria | Excellent (Full Marks) | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | Marks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Understanding of Topic (3 marks) | Demonstrates deep, accurate, and relevant insight | Mostly accurate understanding | General understanding | Inaccurate or vague | /3 |
Critical Analysis (4 marks) | Thoughtful synthesis with clear critique and comparison | Moderate level of analysis and interpretation | Some analysis but largely descriptive | Lacks critical engagement | /4 |
Ethical and Professional Expression (3 marks) | Professional tone, well-referenced, no misconduct | Few minor errors in tone or citation | Some informal tone or citation issues | Poor tone, unclear citation or unethical use | /3 |
Structure and Organisation (3 marks) | Clear, logical flow and well-linked sections | Generally organised and coherent | Structure present but weak transitions | Disorganised, lacks logical structure | /3 |
Referencing and Formatting (2 marks) | APA used accurately throughout | Minor formatting inconsistencies | Multiple referencing issues | Unformatted or unclear referencing | /2 |
Total | /15 |
Please refer to the class slides on academic writing and review structure, and consult previous assignments as useful
input. You may discuss your draft with your supervisor or classmates, but your final submission must be your original work.
Get Help By Expert
Recent Solved Questions
- HBET1103: Introduction to General Linguistics Assignment, OUM, Malaysia Writers create rules that supposedly apply to all human communication, but these rules are often proven to be not universal
- ENV-7020A: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THEORY Coursework, UOA, Malaysia This coursework exercise promotes directed learning on impact prediction practices in Environmental Assessment
- Digital Electronics Assignment, SU, Malaysia Implement the counter using JK flip-flop, and assume that any unused states can be considered ‘don’t care states
- BFW2751: Derivatives 1 Assignment, MUM, Malaysia Nancy Lim a financial analyst, is looking for your guidance regarding her new investment portfolio, which is worth $2 million
- ABCM2103: Discuss the following topic(s) in the forum and submit proof of your participation in the online discussions: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND SOCIETY Assignment, OUM, Malaysia
- CSC408 MIS Case Study Assignment Report: Analysis of Issues and Solutions in Information Systems
- CHE61504: Engineering Fluid Mechanics Assignment, TU, Malaysia Create the dimensionless relationship and design of the airport wind anemometer
- Banking Assignment, APU, Malaysia As a member of the AML, CDD checks need to be performed for the potential client, GMT due to the nature of the business
- K17MA Statistics Assignment: Real-World Case Study on NBA, Probability & Data Analysis
- BAC10204 Assignment 2: Business Report and Presentation Management & Science University