MGT72004 Project Management & Consultancy Assessment 3 | Taylor’s University
| University | Taylor's University (TU) |
| Subject | MGT72004 Project Management & Consultancy |
MGT72004 Assessment 3
Dear Students,
Taylor’s University/College upholds the highest standards of academic integrity. Students must complete their work honestly and ethically, ensuring that all submitted assessments reflect their own understanding and efforts. Any form of academic misconduct, including but not limited to plagiarism, collusion, contract cheating, falsification, and unauthorised use of Gen AI tools, is strictly prohibited and will be subject to disciplinary action in accordance with university regulations.
In this form, there are two (2) sections namely: Section 1 Instruction on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (to be completed by the module leader) and Section 2 Student Acknowledgement and Declaration (to be completed, signed and submitted by the students together with their assessment).
Students are responsible for properly acknowledging all sources, tools, and external contributions in their work. Misuse of AI-generated content, failure to attribute sources, or engagement in dishonest practices may result in penalties ranging from warnings to expulsion, as outlined in the Student Handbook.
This Assessment Submission Declaration Form is attached to the assessment brief. Students are required to complete the Assessment Submission Declaration Form in any piece of work submitted at Taylor’s University/College, except for assessments completed and submitted in controlled environments. For group assessments, each member of the group must complete an Assessment Submission Declaration Form.
SECTION 1: INSTRUCTION ON THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THIS ASSESSMENT
The section below is to be completed by the module leader, i.e. module leader is to put a ‘v’ in the relevant checkbox.
Students are allowed to use Gen AI as stipulated by lecturers in the assessment brief: 1. Use lecturer-approved Gen AI tools only for certain parts of an assessment (e.g. brainstorming, proofreading etc.) or the entire assessment. 2. Use Gen AI for specific purposes only, such as generating drafts, refining language, or conducting exploratory analysis, but not for creating final outputs or core analytical tasks.
You are allowed to use Gen AI tools in any way you find appropriate for the task, provided you acknowledge and explain their usage. This emphasises transparency, critical engagement, and ethical practices.
Assessment is conducted under controlled environments (final exams, practical assessment without written assignment etc). Students are to complete the task independently, without the assistance of Gen AI tools. Where Gen AI tools have been used, you must attach your chat history and an appendix listing the prompt used, the output generated by the generative AI tools, how the output was used and the pages where the AI-generated content can be found as per the table below:
The Gen AI-generated content must be appropriately cited and referenced. Any work submitted using AI tools without proper citation and referenced will be treated as though it was plagiarised. |
INFORMATION ON PENALTIES RELATING TO ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
| Any student found to have engaged in academic misconduct, including but not limited to plagiarism, falsification, contract cheating, or improper AI usage, will be subject to disciplinary action. Penalties may include but are not limited to plagiarism, falsification, contract cheating, or improper AI usage, and will be subject to disciplinary action. Penalties may include but are not limited to:
The penalties that can be imposed on a student who is found to have engaged in academic misconduct include, but not limited to:
For full details, refer to the Student Handbook. |
INFORMATION ON INVESTIGATION PROCESS REGARDING SUSPECTED MISUSE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS
| If an assignment is suspected of improper AI use or other academic integrity violations, the university will follow the official Academic Integrity Investigation Process, which includes:
a) Initial Assessment-The lecturer assesses inconsistencies in writing style, AI detection reports, or academic dishonesty concerns. b) Filing of Report -A Report on Academic Misconduct (THE-ACA-FORM-AINT) is submitted to the Academic Integrity Officer (AIO). c) Review & Evidence Collection – The AIO compiles relevant materials, including previous submissions, Turnitin reports, and AI usage logs. d) Student Explanation – The student may be required to provide additional evidence of their work process, including drafts and source materials. e) Disciplinary Review – The Student Disciplinary Committee (SDC) will determine penalties if misconduct is confirmed f) Final Decision & Notification – The student receives formal notification of the decision, and records are updated accordingly. For full details, refer to the Student Handbook. |
SECTION 2: STUDENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DECLARATION
(*This section is to be completed by students. Students must submit the completed and signed copy of this form together with their assessment)
| Acknowledgment by the student
When Gen AI is allowed to be used, acknowledgement of how Gen AI is used can be included as follows: (Place a tick ‘ ’ in the checkbox where relevant)
The use of GenAI has to be referenced appropriately according to the referencing style as required:
*Please refer to the latest referencing style. Declaration I confirm that: a) I understand what constitutes academic integrity violations, including plagiarism, collusion, fabrication, falsification, contract cheating, and improper use of Gen AI. b) I confirm that my work or any part of this assessment has neither been previously and is not concurrently submitted for any other programme at Taylor’s University or any other institution, save except when re-use of the same work is permitted by the module leader. c) I acknowledge that using Gen AI or any external assistance without proper attribution constitutes academic misconduct and may be sanctioned accordingly. d) I understand that if there are indications of academic integrity breaches, including improper Gen AI use, my work will be subject to investigation. e) This assignment is my own work, and I have properly acknowledged all sources, tools, and external contributions, including the use of Gen AI where applicable. f) I also understand that if there is any indication of inappropriate use of generative AI in my assignment, I may be required to, for instance, attend an oral presentation to justify my work as part of the review process. g) I acknowledge and authorize the submission and/or storage of my work in a database for the purpose of verifying its originality and/or conducting tests using artificial intelligence software, and I hereby consent to this process. h) I acknowledge that this submission is subject to Taylor’s University/College Academic Integrity Procedure (THE-ACA-PROC-AINT) and all applicable university regulations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name & Student ID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Signature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MGT72004 ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW
The final assignment is designed to integrate both theoretical understanding and practical application of project management and consultancy in real-world business contexts. It provides students with the opportunity to demonstrate their ability to analyze, evaluate, and communicate project management practices while engaging with diverse stakeholders.
Students will engage with a real-world organization that undertakes project-based activities (e.g., construction, IT, consulting, energy, healthcare, retail). By conducting an interview with a project manager, consultant, or senior manager, students will explore how project management concepts are applied in practice, the challenges organizations face, and how these practices are influenced by both local and global environments.
Assignment 3 consists of TWO (2) parts:
Part A – Group Task
- To access Part A
- Students will be placed into groups through random assignment.
- As a group, students will conduct a semi-structured interview with a relevant organizational stakeholder to explore key domains of project management and consultancy.
- Based on the interview findings, students must prepare a 12-slide professional communication deck using any modern presentation platform (PowerPoint, Canva, Prezi, Google Slides, Adobe Spark, etc.)
- The group presentation should be recorded and uploaded to YouTube as an unlisted video. The link must then be submitted in the answer box provided in this document.
- Evidence of the interview session must be submitted in this document as well. This includes an interview transcript and pictures of the session.
- Only ONE (1) member of each group is required to submit the completed answer document.
- Please ensure you submit the completed Part A – Group Task answer document to the correct assignment link on Canvas.
Part B – Individual Task
- Based on the insights derived from Part A as well as further research, students are to evaluate project management theories in both local and global contexts.
- Complete this task by submitting your answer within the answer box provided in this document.
- Please ensure you submit the completed Part B – Individual Task answer document to the correct assignment link on Canvas.
Learning Alignment
- MLO 3: Prepare a communication deck with regards to the project management and consultancy approaches in business settings.
- MLO 4: Evaluate the project management and consultancy theories and approaches in local and global business contexts.
Part A
A3 – Part A (Nov 2025) – Interview Transcript.pdf
A3 – Part A (Nov 2025) – Slides.pdf
A3 – Part A (Nov 2025) – Speaker Notes.pdf
Part B
| Requirements of Referencing | Appendix
to be Referred |
Marks | |
| Question 1.B | Referencing is required | Not applicable | 15 marks
(Refer to marking rubrics for details) |
Assessment Context
Project Management in the 21st Century
The field of project management is evolving rapidly, driven by significant contextual changes. In the 21st century, these changes are accelerating, presenting new challenges and opportunities for project managers. Key issues such as sustainability, social responsibility, governance, agility, and artificial intelligence are now at the forefront of project management.
Today’s project managers must adapt to these evolving demands. The 21st century project manager needs to be equipped with skills and methodologies that differ significantly from those of the past. This new breed of project managers must be agile, socially responsible, and proficient in leveraging technology to address contemporary challenges.
The human element also remains crucial in project management. Effective management of human resources is essential for project success. Project managers must possess strong communication skills, empathy, and the ability to foster high-performing teams. These qualities are vital for navigating the complexities of modern projects and achieving professional success.
Finally, sustainability is a critical challenge of our time. Organizations worldwide are integrating sustainability into their strategies and operations. However, the incorporation of sustainability principles into project management practices is still in its early stages. Project managers must lead the way in embedding sustainability into projects to ensure that economic development does not compromise future generations’ needs.
In today’s competitive business environment, effective project management is more important than ever. Whether launching a new product, implementing a complex IT system, or organizing a major event, successful project management is key. It enables organizations to achieve strategic objectives, deliver value to stakeholders, and maintain a competitive edge. By providing clear direction, optimizing resources, managing risks, fostering communication and collaboration, and ensuring quality and adaptability, project management helps businesses navigate complexity and achieve success in the 21st century.
Bibliography
Gonzalez, J. E. R. (2023, November 2). Project Management of the 21st Century. IPMA. https://ipma.world/project-management-of-the-21st-century/
Question 1.B
Individual Task
| Work Required: Building on the insights derived from Part A, and supported by further academic and industry research, you are required to compose a critical analysis that evaluates the relevance and applicability of project management methodologies in today’s globalized and dynamic project environments.
The paper should address the following points: (i) Contemporary Challenges o Discuss the current demands of projects and the new challenges faced by project managers today. (ii) Evaluation of Project Management Methodologies o Select two project management methodologies for discussion. o Critically evaluate how well these methodologies address contemporary challenges. Identify their strengths and limitations in the current context. o Discuss how these methodologies are perceived and applied in local vs. global project contexts, drawing on insights from your interview and additional research. (iii) Future Directions o Propose potential developments or innovations in project management methodologies that could better address the evolving needs of 21st-century projects. Your analysis should demonstrate a comprehensive evaluation of the continued relevance and adaptability of the chosen project management methodologies in today’s dynamic project environments. The report should be well-structured and include relevant justifications. When preparing your response, ensure you address the following aspects:
|
Usage of Gen AI
Assignment Guidelines
|
| Type your answer here |
Reference List
Insert ALL references here for Question 1.B
-END
MGT72004 Assessment 3 Part B Rubrics
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
| Question 1.B Evaluation of Methodologies in Context |
6 to >5.0 pts Outstanding Methodologies are critically and comprehensively evaluated. Theoretical frameworks are applied with precision. Strengths, limitations, and contextual relevance are clearly articulated. Demonstrates nuanced understanding of how methodologies respond to dynamic project environments across local and global settings, supported by well-integrated academic and interview-based evidence. 5 to >2.0 pts 2 to >0 pts |
6 pts |
| Question 1.B Strategic Thinking & Future-Oriented Insight |
6 to >5.0 pts Outstanding Demonstrates exceptional ability to synthesize ideas and propose innovative, future-oriented solutions. Arguments are logically constructed, conceptually rich, and strategically relevant. Shows intellectual independence and deep insight into evolving project needs and methodological innovation. 5 to >2.0 pts 2 to >0 pts |
6 pts |
| Question 1.B Clarity, Structure, & Academic Language |
3 to >2.0 pts Outstanding Writing is polished, coherent, and professional. Grammar and sentence construction are accurate. APA referencing is precise and consistent. Structure enhances readability and supports analytical depth. 2 to >1.0 pts 1 to >0 pts |
3 pts |
Total Points: 15
Get Help By Expert
MGT72004 Project Management & Consultancy assignments require students to critically evaluate methodologies, integrate real-world interview insights, and present structured academic analysis. At Taylor’s University, assessors focus strongly on critical thinking, practical relevance, and proper APA referencing, not just descriptive content. To avoid common pitfalls in individual and group-based assessments, many students rely on management assignment help malaysia. At Assignment Helper , we deliver 100% human-written, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments aligned with university rubrics. For trust and transparency, you can also review our expert-written management assignment samples to understand the quality provided through our Taylor’s University Assignment Help service.
Recent Solved Questions
- Advance Certification in Compliance Essay, MMU, Malaysia Defines your proposals to address the concerns raised in respect of the existing complaints handling process
- ACC416: Cost and Management Accounting Assignment, UiTM, Malaysia Classify the following costs of a franchise pizza chain either prime cost production overhead cost administrative cost
- MPU3233: Plastic bags are commonly used on a daily basis; however, these seemingly insignificant: Design Thinking Assignment, UIU, Malaysia
- STA404: Statistics for Business and Social Sciences Assignment, UiTM, Malaysia A study was conducted to determine the relationship between a driver’s age and the number of accidents he or she had over a 3-year period
- Accounting and Finance Assignment, UUM, Malaysia Great Excel Traders has a branch at Kota Tinggi. All accounts are maintained at the Head Office in Johor Bahru
- MBA7173 Research Methodology, Assignment, Malaysia
- FHHM1114 INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY OCTOBER 2024 TRIMESTER Assignment
- Management Decision Science (MDS) Assignment, MMU, Malaysia
- UGB264: Business Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability Report, UOS, Malaysia Examine and discuss the key challenges around corporate responsibility, relating directly to the ethical stance
- DCP5101: Program Design Assignment, MMU, Malaysia I need a standalone console application that can keep track of my restaurant sales. Customers will typically order food and drinks
