PSY63904/ PSY62604 History of Psychology Assessment Brief 2026

University Taylor's University (TU)
Subject PSY63904/ PSY62604 History of Psychology

PSY62604 /PSY63904 Assessment Brief

Assessment Type Submission Date (%)
*Continuous Assessment 1. Group Project Week 10 40%
(60%) 2. Psychodrama Week 11 & 12 20%
Final Examination

(40%)

Comprehensive

(MCQs and/or, Short Answer Questions and/or Essays)

Week 15/16/17 40%

 * PLAGIARISM IS A SERIOUS OFFENCE AND PLAGIARIZED WORK WILL RESULT IN AN F GRADE.

Hurdle assessment guideline for the module:

  • Students are required to pass BOTH continuous and final assessments to pass this module. The minimum passing marks are as follows:
Continuous assessment: 40% (24/60 marks)
Final Assessment: 40% (16/40 marks)
Overall module final passing mark: 50% (50/100 marks)
  • Students who achieve an overall final module mark of 50% or higher but the score below 40% in either continuous or the final assessment will receive a Grade D+ and are eligible for re-sit opportunities in the failed component(s).
  • Students with an overall final module mark between 40% and 49% (Grade D-, D and D+) may re-sit any component where the mark is below 50%. If both components are below 50%, re-sits will be granted for both failed components.
  • The final module grade after the re-sit will be capped at Grade C.

Group Project Task 1  –  Written Assignment (20%)

Title: “Tracing Historical Threads: The Influence of History on 21st-Century Life Contexts”

Objective

This group assignment encourages students to delve into the historical roots of contemporary life contexts, fostering critical thinking, research skills, and the ability to recognize the enduring impact of history on present-day perspectives and practices.

Instruction

  1. Select a specific life context of your choice (e.g., education, healthcare, technology, social relationships, etc.) that you believe has been significantly influenced by historical factors.
  2. Research and analyse historical events, trends, and societal changes that have played a role in shaping the chosen life context in the 21st century. Consider historical developments that have had a lasting impact on current attitudes, practices, and values within this context.
  3. Explain how these historical influences have carried forward into the 21st century, impacting current perspectives, practices, and values within the chosen life context.
  4. Offer specific examples or case studies that demonstrate the direct connection between historical events and contemporary manifestations within your chosen life context.
  5. Reflect on the implications of understanding historical influences on the chosen life context. Consider how this awareness can enhance our comprehension of current challenges, opportunities, and evolving trends.
  6. Conclude your assignment by summarizing the key historical influences you identified and emphasizing the significance of recognizing history’s ongoing impact on shaping the 21st century.

Assignment Writing Guideline

Title: Tracing Historical Threads: The Influence of History on 21st-Century Life Contexts

 1. Introduction

  • Introduce the selected life context (e.g., education, healthcare, technology, social relationships, mental health).
  • Explain the relevance and importance of this context in the 21st century.
  • Clearly state the purpose of the assignment, which is to examine how historical developments have shaped current perspectives, practices, and values.

 2. Background of the Life Context

  • Define and describe the chosen life context.
  • Explain how it operates in the present day.
  • Briefly highlight current trends, challenges, or issues related to this context.

 3. Historical Development

  • Identify and discuss key historical events, developments, or societal changes relevant to the chosen life context.
  • Explain what occurred, when it occurred, and why it was significant.
  • Demonstrate depth of research by incorporating multiple sources.

Students may organise this section either:

  • Chronologically (past to present), or
  • Thematically (e.g., policy changes, technological developments, cultural shifts) 

4. Connection to the 21st Century

  • Clearly explain how the identified historical developments have influenced current perspectives, practices, and values.
  • Demonstrate explicit links between past events and present-day realities.

5. Examples and Case Studies

  • Provide relevant and specific examples or case studies that illustrate the connection between historical influences and current practices.
  • Ensure that each example clearly demonstrates how a historical factor has shaped a present-day outcome.

6. Critical Reflection

  • Reflect on the broader implications of understanding historical influences.
  • Discuss how this understanding contributes to interpreting current challenges, opportunities, and future developments within the chosen life context.

7. Conclusion

  • Summarise the key historical influences discussed in the paper.
  • Reinforce the significance of understanding the role of history in shaping contemporary life contexts.

8. References

  • All sources must be cited using APA format.
  • Students are expected to use credible academic sources (e.g., journal articles, books, official reports).

Submission

  • Format: Submit your assignment in PDF format. The PDF must include a complete cover page with the following details: Name, Student ID, Course Code, Course Section, Title, and Date.
  • Submission Platform: Upload the assignment through MyTimes in Week 10 (28/6/2026).
  • Language: The assignment may be completed and submitted in English only.

Assessment Rubric

Criteria Excellent (4%) Proficient (3%) Sa_sfactory (2%) Needs

Improvement

(1%)

Inadequate (0-

0.5%)

Thorough Research (4%)

Sec$on 3: Historical

Development

Sec$on 8: References

Demonstrates an excep\onal depth of research,

showcasing a

comprehensive

understanding of

historical events, trends, and

societal changes

related to the chosen life context.

Exhibits a thorough

research effort, reflec\ng a strong

understanding of relevant

historical

influences on the chosen life context.

Presents a sa\sfactory level of research,

indica\ng an

understanding of some key

historical events and trends that have impacted the chosen life context.

Shows limited research, with a somewhat superficial

explora\on of historical

influences related to the chosen life context.

Lacks meaningful research,

resul\ng in an insufficient

understanding of historical events and trends that

have shaped the chosen life context.

Connec\on to

Modern Context (4%)

Sec$on 4: Connec$on to the 21st Century

Clearly and compellingly

explains how historical

influences have significantly

impacted modern perspec\ves,

prac\ces, and

values within the chosen life context.

Presents a clear explana\on of

the link between historical

influences and modern

manifesta\ons within the

chosen life context.

Provides an adequate

explana\on of how historical

influences have carried forward

and impacted modern

perspec\ves,

prac\ces, and values in the

Offers a limited or somewhat unclear connec\on

between historical influences and modern

manifesta\ons

within the chosen life context.

Fails to establish a meaningful

connec\on between historical

influences and modern

perspec\ves,

prac\ces, and

values within the chosen life context.

Criteria Excellent (4%) Proficient (3%) Sa_sfactory (2%) Needs

Improvement

(1%)

Inadequate (0-

0.5%)

chosen life

context.

Examples and Case Studies

(4%)

Sec$on 5: Examples and

Case Studies

Provides highly relevant and

compelling

examples or case studies that effec\vely

illustrate the connec\on

between historical events and modern

manifesta\ons

within the chosen

life context (relate

to Taylor’s Mental

Health Event)

Offers wellchosen examples or case studies

that support the argument and

demonstrate the impact of

historical

influences on the chosen life context.

Presents relevant examples or case studies, though

some may lack depth or

thorough explana\on.

Provides examples or case studies that are

somewhat

tangen\al or

inadequately explained in

rela\on to the historical

influences and modern

manifesta\ons.

Provides weak or irrelevant

examples,

demonstra\ng a

lack of

understanding of

their significance in illustra\ng historical

influences on the chosen life context.

Cri\cal Reflec\on (4%)

Sec$on 6: Cri$cal

Reflec$on

Offers profound insights into the implica\ons of

understanding historical

influences on the chosen life context,

Provides thoughdul

reflec\ons on the

implica\ons of historical

influences,

showing an understanding of

Presents basic reflec\ons on the

implica\ons of historical

influences, but

lacks depth or nuance in discussing their

Offers minimal reflec\ons on the

implica\ons of historical

influences, and

these reflec\ons

may lack clarity or relevance to the

Lacks meaningful cri\cal reflec\on on the

implica\ons of historical

influences for the chosen life context.

Criteria Excellent (4%) Proficient (3%) Sa_sfactory (2%) Needs

Improvement

(1%)

Inadequate (0-

0.5%)

demonstra\ng a deep

understanding of their broader significance.

their relevance

to the chosen life context.

broader significance. chosen life

context.

Wrifen

Expression and Organiza\on

(4%)

Sec$on 1: Introduc$on

Sec$on 2: Background of the Life Context

Sec$on 7: Conclusion

Ideas are coherent, with

excep\onal clarity and logical

organiza\on

across all sec\ons

(including

Introduc\on,

Background, and Conclusion).

Wri\ng is polished, with

appropriate academic

language and minimal errors.

Ideas are clear and well-

organized across sec\ons.

Language is appropriate and generally accurate.

Ideas are generally clear,

though minor

issues with clarity,

organiza\on, or

language may be

present. Overall structure is

evident but may lack smooth flow.

There are no\ceable issues with clarity,

organiza\on, or language that

occasionally affect

understanding.

Some sec\ons may be

underdeveloped or poorly structured.

Persistent problems in clarity,

organiza\on, or language

significantly hinder

understanding.

Structure is weak or unclear, with

poorly developed or missing sec\ons.

Group Project Task 2  –  Infographic Design (20%)

Topic: Icons Of Thoughts: A Journey Through Psychology

Instruction Division Allocation 

  • You will be randomly assigned a division by the lecturer (Basic / Applied / Applied-Professional).

Select a Prominent Figure

  • Once you know your assigned Division, you must select one prominent figure from that division. Ensure that no two groups choose the same figure. You are required to upload the name of your chosen figure via the provided link.

Create a Social Media Infographic (CANVA)

  • Based on your chosen figure, design a social-media-friendly infographic suitable for platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, or Facebook. Use your creativity to ensure the content is engaging and visually appealing.
  • All design work must be completed and evidenced within Canva. Groups must demonstrate clear progress within Canva. Submissions without verifiable Canva editing history will not be graded.
  • You will be required to add your tutor’s email to Canva to provide access for monitoring and verification of your work.

Content Requirements for the Infographic

Introduction of the Figure & Field (5%)

  • Brief background of the figure (lifespan, education, career).
  • The psychology division selected.

Major Contributions to the Field (5%)

  • Key theories, models, or experiments introduced.
  • Research methodology used (e.g., experimental, quantitative, qualitative, or mixed).
  • How these contributions legitimised the field scientifically.

Analysis of the “Scientific Turn” (5%)

  • Students must analyze (not just describe) how the figure and field contributed to making psychology more scientific.
  • Did the field adopt methods from natural sciences (biology, medicine, mathematics, statistics)?
  • How does it meet the criteria of science: objectivity, replicability, measurement, testable theories?
  • Critiques of the field: Is it sufficiently “scientific,” or is it still debated?

Reflection & Contemporary Relevance (5%)

  • How the legacy of this figure/field remains relevant today.
  • Student’s perspective: To what extent does this field truly establish psychology as a scientific discipline?

Submission

  • Format: Submit your assignment in PDF format. The PDF must include a complete cover page with the following details: Name, Student ID, Course Code, Course Section, Title, and Date.
  • Social Media Link: Include the URL link to your social media post (TikTok, Instagram, or Facebook) inside the PDF.
  • Submission Platform: Upload the assignment through MyTimes in Week 10.
  • Language: The assignment may be completed and submitted in English only.

Grading Rubric (20%)

Component 5 % (Excellent) 4 % (Good) 3 % (Fair) 1–2 % (Weak)
1.

Introduction of Figure &

Field (5%)

Background is clear, comprehensive, and accurate; includes lifespan, education,

career, and clearly identifies the psychology field/division.

Background is clear and accurate but

slightly lacking detail or depth.

Basic background provided but limited detail, clarity, or

connection to the field.

Incomplete, unclear, or inaccurate

background; field not clearly identified.

2. Major

Contributions of the Figure

(5%)

Thorough explanation of key theories, models, or experiments;

includes clear

examples, methodol ogy used, and strong explanation of how contributions advanced psychology scientifically.

Good explanation of contributions with

some examples; methodology

mentioned but not fully explained;

scientific impact somewhat clear.

Basic description of contributions with

limited explanation; examples or

methodology

unclear or missing; weak link to scientific impact.

Minimal, unclear, or inaccurate

contributions; no meaningful

explanation or examples.

3. Scientific Analysis &

Critique (5%)

Strong critical analysis linking the figure/field Good analysis with relevant links to scientific criteria; Mostly descriptive; limited analysis of scientific features; Little or no analysis; lacks understanding of scientific criteria;
to scientific

methods (e.g., experimental,

quantitative) and key criteria

(objectivity, replicability,

measurement, testability);

includes clear

evaluation or

critique of scientific status.

some critical

evaluation present but less depth.

critique is weak or superficial. no meaningful critique.
4. Reflection

&

Contemporary

Relevance

(5%)

Deep, insightful reflection with

strong connection to modern psychology;

clearly evaluates the field’s role in establishing

psychology as a science.

Relevant reflection with some depth; connection to

current psychology is present but less developed.

Basic reflection; limited insight or

weak connection to contemporary relevance.

Minimal or unclear reflection; little to no relevance to current psychology.

Psychodrama (20%)

Title: “Psychodrama Through Time: Bringing Historical Concepts to Life”

Objectives

  • To creatively explore key psychological concepts from different historical eras through psychodrama, engaging students in an immersive understanding of the evolution of these concepts.
  • To combine historical exploration with acting and role play, enhancing students’ engagement and understanding.
  • To nurture creativity, empathy, critical thinking, and the ability to differentiate the historical eras through experiential learning.

Instruction

  • Students will be assigned into groups and allocated a specific historical era (e.g., Ancient, Renaissance, Behaviorism, Cognitive Revolution).
  • Each group must collaboratively select one or two key psychological concepts or theories that were influential during the assigned era.
  • Conduct thorough research on the selected concepts, including their theoretical foundations, research methodologies, historical context, and implications for psychology.
  • Develop a well-structured script that includes meaningful dialogues and interactions among relevant historical figures.
  • Ensure the script accurately reflects the perspectives, debates, and societal influences characteristic of the historical era.
  • Rehearse the performance to deliver a clear, engaging, and accurate portrayal of the selected concepts.
  • Clearly demonstrate how the chosen concepts reflect the dominant psychological theories, methodologies, and societal influences of the time.
  • Include an interactive element in the presentation (e.g., audience questions, short discussion, or participation activity).
  • Ensure the performance clearly communicates key concepts, historical context, and the accuracy of psychological content.
  • Conclude the presentation with a brief discussion highlighting similarities and differences between concepts across eras, followed by a reflection on their evolution and relevance in modern psychology.
  • Each group is required to present for a minimum of 20 minutes and a maximum of 25 minutes. Presentations shorter than 20 minutes will result in mark deductions, and presentations must not exceed 25 minutes.

Psychodrama will start on Week 11 & 12

Assessment Rubric

Assessment

Criteria

Excellent (5%) Good (4%) Sa_sfactory (2-3%) Needs Improvement

(0-1%)

Script

Development

(5%)

Collabora\vely creates a well-

structured and

engaging script that vividly captures

historical contexts and effec\vely

portrays characters’ perspec\ves.

Develops a coherent script that generally

captures historical contexts and characters’ perspec\ves.

Creates a script with some structure, but lacks depth in

historical context and character portrayal.

Presents an underdeveloped or

disorganized script with limited

historical context and character perspec\ve.

Ac_ng and

Roleplay

(5%)

Effec\vely embodies historical figures, demonstra\ng a profound understanding of their viewpoints and skillfully portraying debates. Embodies historical figures with

competence,

showcasing a clear understanding of their viewpoints and engaging in debates adequately.

Portrays historical figures

inconsistently,

occasionally failing to fully convey their viewpoints or engage in debates convincingly.

Struggles to embody historical figures and lacks understanding of their viewpoints and engagement in debates.
Discussion on Different

Eras (5%)

Leads insighdul discussions about

the dis\nc\ons and commonali\es among the presented concepts from different

historical eras.

Effec\vely highlights the influences of

Contributes meaningful insights

to discussions on the dis\nc\ons and commonali\es among concepts from different historical eras.

Makes connec\ons between historical

Contributes to discussions on different eras with some relevant points, but connec\ons between history and psychological theories lack depth. Contributes minimally to discussions on different eras, with weak connec\ons between historical contexts and psychological theories.
Assessment  Criteria Excellent (5%) Good (4%) Sa_sfactory (2-3%) Needs Improvement

(0-1%)

historical contexts on psychological theories. contexts and

psychological theories.

Reflec_ve Analysis (5%) Offers insighdul reflec\ons on the

evolu\on, impact,

and relevance of concepts,

demonstra\ng a deep understanding.

Provides thoughdul reflec\ons on the

evolu\on, impact, and relevance of

concepts, displaying a good

understanding.

Offers basic reflec\ons on the

evolu\on, impact, and relevance of

concepts, lacking depth.

Offers limited or superficial

reflec\ons on the

evolu\on, impact, and relevance of concepts.

Final Exam (40%)

  • Marking scheme will be used for this assessment.
  • Hurdle assessment guideline for the module:

Final examination is a closed-book examination. It seeks to determine students’ individual effectiveness in responding to specific questions under time-constrained invigilated conditions. Students are required to sit/attempt the final examination.

Failure to do so would result in a fail grade (F).

  • A student who obtains a final mark of 40% to 49% for the module will be allowed to resit. The maximum mark that will be awarded for a resit is a pass (50%).

Are You Searching Answer of this Question?

Request Malaysian writers to write a plagiarism-free copy tailored to your question.

Get Help By Expert

Many students find the PSY63904 history of psychology assignment difficult because it requires analysing historical theories, applying critical thinking, conducting academic research, and following APA referencing guidelines. That’s why they often search for write my assignment for me to get an expert-written solution. If you’re facing similar challenges, you can also choose Assignment Helper. Our experts provide psychology assignment help along with psychology assignment samples, so you can confidently order a customised solution that meets your assessment requirements.

Answer Preview

Need the complete answer?

Need a custom solution for this question?

Share your module details and get fast, original academic support from our team.