CSC408 Management Information Systems Assignment Brief 2026 | UiTM
CSC408 Assignment Brief
Type : Case Study
Note: Case Study/Assignment Submission Guidelines for ETHICS requirements.
You are required to use an anti-plagiarism tool advised by your lecturer to check your assignment for plagiarism and whether it complies with ethical standards regarding originality and citation. The tool will also check the similarity of your work to original sources. Your lecturer will confirm whether they require a hard copy of your assignment and/or a soft copy (For example: via Turnitin/online portal). Below is the Anti-Plagiarism Criterion Rubric guide, which will be used to assess your anti-plagiarism compliance.
| SIMILARITY INDEX/AI DETECTION (%) | Result | Action |
| <25% | Proceed to submit | No further revisions are needed; unless otherwise instructed by the lecturer. |
| >=25% | Re-submit | Revise the assignment to reduce similarity and ensure proper citation, then submit again. |
Assignment Rubric
| Rubric code | Rubric Criteria &
Weightage |
Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
| R1 | Introduction [3] | Excellent explanation and
overview of the case study topic |
Good explanation and overview of the case study topic | Adequate explanation and overview of the case study topic | Inadequate explanation and
overview of the case study topic |
| R2 | Analysis [5] | Comprehensive and thorough analysis that covers all aspects of the topic | Clear analysis that covers all aspects of the topic | Basic analysis that covers all aspects of the topic | Incomplete and wrong understanding in analysis of all aspects of the topic. |
| R3 | Identify issues [3]
• Students will identify real or potential problems |
Thoroughly and accurately identifies and summarizes main issues, critically addressing their relationships with each other | Clearly identifies and summarizes the main issues but hardly addresses their relationship to each other. | Adequately identifies main issues but does not summarize or explain them clearly or sufficiently | Poorly identifies, summarizes, or explains the main issue or question. Represents the issues inaccurately or inappropriately. |
| R4 | Identify solutions [4]
• Students will develop, evaluate, and present possible solutions where appropriate |
Thoroughly defines steps in problem-solving.
• Achieves, clear conclusions from the data • Employs creativity in the search for a solution. • Recognizes and values alternative problem-solving methods, when appropriate. |
Clearly defines steps in problemsolving.
• Focuses on difficult problems with persistence. • Understand the real-world relevance of the problem. • Provides a logical interpretation of the data |
Adequately defines steps in problem-solving.
• Can identify problem types. • Relies on standardized solution methods, rather than guesswork or intuition. • Understands the level of complexity of a problem. |
Inadequate description of problem-solving steps.
• Does not understand problems in the given context. • Inability to choose appropriate solutions |
| R5 | Knowledge extraction [5] (Suggestion, comparison, information accuracy, conclusion) | Proficient (outstanding) explanation | Clear explanation | Adequate explanation | Poor explanation |
| R6 | Report writing element [3]
• Structured and organized • Clarity of language • Consistency of content Use of figurative language for all materials |
Comprehensively reflects the following elements:
• The text is distinctly understandable. • The format is both appropriate and attractive. • No misspelled words (or make only a rare misspelling in a long or complex text). |
Clearly reflects the following elements:
• The text is clearly understandable. • The format is appropriate. • Few misspellings in proportion to the length and complexity of the text |
Adequately reflects the following elements:
• The text is generally understandable. • The format is acceptable. • Several misspellings in proportion to the length and complexity of the text. |
Poorly reflects the following elements:
• The text is generally poorly written. • The format is unacceptable. • Frequent misspellings are distracting, regardless of the length or complexity of the text. |
| R7 | Anti-plagiarism | Refer to the note for the next course of action. | |||
| MQF2 | Rubric Criteria | Weight | Score (1-4) |
| LOTS | Introduction | 3 | |
| COGNITIVE | Analysis | 5 | |
| COGNITIVE | Identify issues | 4 | |
| HOTS | Identify solutions | 5 | |
| PRACTICAL
SKILLS |
Knowledge extraction | 5 | |
| PRACTICAL
SKILLS |
Report writing | 3 | |
| Total marks (/100) | |||
| (20%) |
Are You Searching Answer of this Question?
Request Malaysian writers to write a plagiarism-free copy tailored to your question.
Get Help By Expert
Are you also finding your CSC408 management information systems case study more challenging than expected? From analysing business cases and identifying real issues to recommending practical solutions that meet the rubric, many UiTM students face the same difficulties. Assignment Helper Malaysia offers professional management ssignment writing service with human-written, plagiarism-free content. You can also explore our UiTM assignment examples before getting expert case study help.
Need the complete answer?
Need a custom solution for this question?
Share your module details and get fast, original academic support from our team.